Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's the point. I'm not surprised, I'm not offended. I believe the > disgruntled have made their point, and I definitely supported them > while the debate was active. Now that it's over, and a done deal, I > think it would be much better for them to now (begrudingly, > reluctantly, ...) tick the damn box and move on.
As I said before, it's just not that simple. > But to put in thousands of hours of > work to create free map data that can be used by anyone, and then to > finish up having contributed nothing strikes me as a spectacularly > selfish act of self-immolation. Is it selfish of Google or Nearmap to not allow use of their data under the ODbL and CTs? -- Sam Couter | mailto:s...@couter.id.au OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
