On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:54 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
> Australian Decliners,
> 
> As a mapper, contributor and member of the project's sysadmin team I
> kindly ask you to please reconsider your declined status. Time is
> about to run out.

I am a decliner, and contributed substantial amounts of data to the map
(mainly in Adelaide, Melbourne & Geelong) back in the early days of OSM
(late 2007 to mid 2009), although I haven't made any edits in almost 2
years now (that's not OSM's fault -- I just haven't had the time
recently).

Whilst I'd prefer that my old contributions remained in use by the
community, as originally intended, I still have reservations about the
open-ended relicensing provisions of the new CTs.

I've just re-read the CTs, and must admit they do look less
objectionable to me now than when I first read them -- outside of the
future reclicensing provisions (clause 3), I don't have any problem with
them.

Re those provisions, I still have one question, which I'm hoping someone
on the list can address.

Clause 3 talks about "or such other free and open licence". I'm curious
as to how "free and open license" is defined in this context.

Both the FSD and the OSD speak specifically to software, not data. In
the software world, there have been instances in the past of licenses
claiming to be "free" or "open source", without actually adhering to the
FSD or OSD. I suspect the same will be true in years to come with
respect to licensing of data.

To agree to such a future relicensing provision, I think the parameters
around it would need to be fairly well defined (not so open-ended). In
the absence of a definition in the CTs themselves, that would mean a
well-recognised definition of "free and open license" (with respect to
data) existing somewhere else (like the FSD & OSD do in the software
domain).

Can anyone point me to such a definition?

Regards,



Jack Burton
<j...@saosce.com.au>


_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to