through_route belongs to the transit tag (and is documented in the wiki on that page)
I'm highly doubtful if any router is actually making proper use of lane attributes beyond turn:lanes currently. I think it's actually the angle at which the slip road splits off, that's responsible for the strange routing instruction. But I haven't had time to experiment with that yet. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael <m.ja...@internode.on.net> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2018 22:12 > To: 'OSM Australian Talk List' <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: [talk-au] FW: Am I doing intersections right? > > Sorry, > > Though not all of those slip lanes is the same, the broken one has > through_route which is not a valid tag. (Category rejected) > > Several other relations there also have that tag, however they are > all named ways. > > Perhaps that is the cause? > > > (Second reply for the list) > > -----Original Message----- > From: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au <osm.talk- > a...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2018 11:36 PM > To: 'OSM Australian Talk List' <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right? > > Please don't break my placement tags. (I've restored them.) They > were there on purpose, and they are not what causes OSRM to > generate that "Turn left onto unnamed road" instruction. > > Also, please don't delete my transit relations, these things take a > lot of work to properly setup without explicit editor support. > > In case you are wondering what these tags are for, they are part of > detailed lane tagging as you can see here: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ednlniwp6bcl5wk/1521024394681.jpg?dl=0 > > The placement=transition tag is necessary to indicate that this > particular segment is not actually where it is in the real world, > but is necessary because of the discrepancy between mapping roads > as lines and roads having a width an multiple lanes in the real > world. > > The transit relation is necessary to define which of the lanes from > one way segment connect to which of the lanes in the next way > segment. In this case it indicates that the leftmost turn lane > flows straight into that slip road. > > > The other 3 slip roads at this intersection have the same tags, and > they do not result in OSRM producing such a driving instruction. If > there were any obvious tagging mistakes, I would have fixed them > already. > > > Cheers, > Thorsten > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael <m.ja...@internode.on.net> > > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2018 19:33 > > To: 'OSM Australian Talk List' <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right? > > > > Ok it seems the OSM website will not centre you on an area from a > link > > but takes you back to the last area you looked at. > > > > Now ... I have removed 2 tags from the slip lane sections. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael <m.ja...@internode.on.net> > > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2018 7:13 PM > > To: 'OSM Australian Talk List' <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right? > > > > For some reason it wont show me the location of the pins when I > go to > > that link. > > > > I had looked at that area once before and noticed some odd stuff > in > > josm but left it alone. > > > > I've gone back in with josm and made some changes, if the routing > > starts working (note sure on caching times before we see it) then > I > > would call it fixed. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au <osm.talk- > > a...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2018 6:46 PM > > To: 'OSM Australian Talk List' <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right? > > > > From: Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2018 17:01 > > To: OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right? > > > > > I agree, if there if is not named via a sign or otherwise on > the > > > ground then I would leave the name field on the link road empty. > > > Routers should be able to work out the best instructions to > give > > > without a name on the link via the network already. > > > > I fully agree that that's the way it should be, unfortunately the > > routers don't seem to always get it right: > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=- > > 27.24200%2C153.02386%3B-27.24130%2C153.02422 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
