Not sure why I can't find it on the list archives but there was some discussion about this below. In short, I'm in favour of not uploading duplicate state borders and during or post-import we manually fix up the relations to use the existing state boundaries.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 12:35, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I'm in favour of first manually removing the >> state borders so we don't dump more nodes on top and then post-upload >> we can just join the new relations to the existing state borders where >> they meet. > > > I can see your point about not wanting to upload ways and nodes that just > going to be deleted immediately after. However if we don't then it's going to > make my idea for QA harder. I'd assumed that we'd be uploading valid > multi-polygons which means that we could use Overpass and the JOSM validator > for QA. I guess we might be able to come up with another approach but I'm not > sure it's worth the effort just to avoid adding and removing a few tens of > thousands of nodes in comparison to the size of the import. On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 15:04, Joel H. <jo...@disroot.org> wrote: > > One last note (and I don't know if this has been mentioned already). > > But it seems that the State boundary (at least on the QLD/NSW boarder) > doesn't match up precisely with what we already have in OSM. Should we > remove the outer edges of the PSMA data and then add existing state ways? > > On 22/10/18 1:40 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > >> I don't know if this was introduced in the simplification or it was an > > error with PSMA. But there is only 26 of these errors in QLD so I would > > hardly call this an issue, you can easily fix these manually. > > > > I'm not sure either, so unless there's a better/automated way, let's > > just address this manually either during the import or immediately > > after. > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 12:33, Joel H. <jo...@disroot.org> wrote: > >> On 19/10/18 5:01 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > >> > >>> Is there a problem with crossing ways? Why do they need a shared node > >>> when they are different admin levels? > >> > >> Yes jump to the position I told you and zoom right in to the > >> intersection, there is a crossover between two level 10 admin areas. > >> > >> I don't know if this was introduced in the simplification or it was an > >> error with PSMA. But there is only 26 of these errors in QLD so I would > >> hardly call this an issue, you can easily fix these manually. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-au mailing list > >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
