I agree that putting the building on the map should rank higher than giving it a lifecycle or damaged attribute that hard to assess from the image quality.
This is also the approach I recall from HOT disaster mapping. Roads and building from satellite, destruction details from ground crew. (Admittedly I might be wrong here). On 8 February 2020 6:44:30 pm AEDT, John Bryant <johnwbry...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> *Maybe swap across to LPI imagery & just map all the buildings & >other >> POI, without worrying about damage? That would be a huge bonus as far >as >> OSM is concerned, but wouldn't actually do anything at all for the >disaster >> recovery side of things?* >> > This seems like a productive idea to me... capturing buildings in >bushfire-affected areas could produce a useful input to spatial >analyses. I >don't know what the agencies already have in this regard though. > >On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 17:14, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com> wrote: > >> Some new imagery is being uploaded... not sure on resolution >> >> >> Cheers - Phil, >> On the road with his iPad >> >> On 8 Feb 2020, at 5:49 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:24, Ewen Hill <ewen.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sadly the Planet quality appears less than optimal. >>> >> >> You're not wrong! >> >> >>> If I look at the town of Cobargo where there were buildings lost >just >>> north east of the Narira Creek Highway crossing, I can't tell.what >has been >>> destroyed, damaged or otherwise. : >>> https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/7898?task=591 >>> >> >> No, there's no way of telling if a building has been damaged - I'm >been >> mapping for a while & I couldn't even pick them as buildings, without >> changing to a different set of imagery. Where I was just looking I >couldn't >> even tell if the area had actually been burnt over - it all looked >like >> normal dry grassland to me? >> >> I think we really need to come up with a backup plan for this event >and >>> quietly push SSSI towards that. >>> >> >> Maybe swap across to LPI imagery & just map all the buildings & other >POI, >> without worrying about damage? That would be a huge bonus as far as >OSM is >> concerned, but wouldn't actually do anything at all for the disaster >> recovery side of things? >> >> >>> We don't want people's first taste of OSM to be a poor one. >>> >> >> No, & I agree with you that it won't be a good, first look :-( >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
