Resending message to the list :-( How do we fix it so that "Reply" goes to the list, not just the last poster?
Thanks Graeme ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:20 Subject: Re: [talk-au] vine row tagging To: John Bryant <johnwbry...@gmail.com> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 16:34, John Bryant <johnwbry...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, they want to map rows, to use OSM in a way that will be useful to > the viticulture community. The idea is to add more detail to vineyards than > is currently in OSM, which has vineyard areas but not rows. > > To some degree, but for viticulture people it would be useful to use > *actual* rather than assumed locations. > Fair enough. Referring to the OSM carto rendering? That's a good point. What else could > we use to describe a vine row? > As Brendan mentioned, mark them in as fences, which will show a nice straight line, although that could be called tagging for the renderer! :-) It wouldn't be altogether wrong though, as they do form a barrier to movement across the rows! do features like vine rows belong in OSM? Does the difficulty in finding a > tagging schema for vine rows point to an incompatible feature type? I had > assumed that because they're readily observable on the ground, and > relatively persistent, it would make sense to map them... but if there's a > reason they shouldn't be in OSM it would be good to know, so the folks I'm > helping can change course. > I guess that's a question of what do the end-users want to see about "their" land? Most would probably be happy just to see it as a vineyard, but if somebody wants extra detail, is it up to us to say "No"? I wouldn't have said so, myself! Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
