Hi Sebastian Azagra,
Thank you for joining in the discussions. Michael Collinson wrote "I
continue to welcome him (Sebastian) in our OSM community". I second
that. Though I have some problems with your bicycle edits, I am very
appreciative of the hard work you do to support OSM.
I have feedback from Ewen Hill, Michael Collinson, Graeme Fitzpatrick,
Ian Steer and Warin which appear to support my position. Only Ben
Kelley might support Sebastian's position, he writes "In NSW by
default it is not allowed (unless signpost as a shared path). I assume
Victoria is the same".
Ben, I would like to ask you some additional questions to tease out
your opinions. You are more familiar with NSW law, I am happy for you
to assume Victorian and NSW law to be the same for the purposes of
this discussion.
1) Was Sebastian justified in removing bicycle=yes from way 1008258040 ?
2) Are no signs present to indicated bikes are permitted sufficient
evidence that bicycles are disallowed?
3) For the following 3 examples assume there is no signage, would
addition of bicycle=no or deletion of bicycle=yes be justified?
3a) A typical footpath in the sidewalk sense:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.896764706666&lng=145.28943507&z=17&pKey=428476962255750&focus=photo
3b) A path with almost no access to residental properties, parallel
with a freeway or arterial road:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.99755833333299&lng=145.16624444444005&z=17&pKey=469416987632807&focus=photo
3c) A path not associated with a road:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.924151150055&lng=145.32763449&z=17&pKey=494613405004623&focus=photo
Thanks
Tony
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
