Hi,

I'm specifically talking of hiking paths.


------------------------------------

Highways I think are already mapped correctly ... digging one out now ..

The Great Western Highway exists as a route of 682 members

Most of the members carry the same name as the route. But some carry other names


Such as;

Way: Stewart Street (176174126)     "alt_name"="Great Western Highway"

Way: Durham Street (228061611)    "alt_name"="Great Western Highway"

Way: Sydney Road (375627444)     "alt_name"="Great Western Highway"


The DCS Base Map  agrees in that  'Great Western Highway' does not appear in these sections but the name now appearing in OSM is used.

I checked Coles Express Bathurst - their address is given as Durham Street not Great Western Highway ... so Durhams Street is used in preference to Great Western Highway here.



On 16/5/24 20:23, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi Warin

I would expect the highest order entity, the longest or biggest entity, to be the primary name. For example the Hume Highway will include a lot of High Streets, Station Streets or Main streets of country towns. In my mind its first the Hume Highway and secondly High Street wherever. I havent given it a lot of thought, its just how it feels.

Tony

HI,

On some paths route signs have been used to 'name' the path.


One example is the 'Great North Walk', a Sydney to Newcastle walking
route, where many of the paths existed before the route was created. I
think this is a combination of mistaking the route signage as the track
name and route relations not rendering.


In the Blue Mountains some paths have more than one OSM way - each with
different 'name', at least some of these are routes that may, I repeat
may, not be the true path name.


Example

Way 1199677262 - 'Grand Clifftop Walk'

Way 22761613 - 'Overcliff Track' Note NPWS route 'Overcliff-Undercliff
track' .. the over cliff track is mapped separately in OSM. A route
relation could be made with both these tracks and a website link..

--------------------------

In the Blue Mts where there are overlayed ways and one of them is a
route I think it would be best to remove that way and include the
remaining way in a route relation .. I think most of this is the 'Great
Cliff Top Walk' route and that would then remove the double overlayed
ways. .


Thoughts/comments ???



_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

_____________________________________________________
This mail has been virus scanned by Australia On Line
see http://www.australiaonline.net.au/mailscanning





_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to