On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:41:38 +0200, Renaud MICHEL <r.h.michel+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le mardi 10 août 2010 à 10:22, Tim Francois a écrit : >> +1. Yup, this is what is currently happening in most of the UK - a >> separate relation for the 'up' and 'down' bus routes, so that >> forwards/backwards (which is kinda broken as a concept in this case) >> is not required! > > I'm interested, for now I have created single relation for a bus route in > Liège. > How should I tag the two separate relations? > > The page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses > doesn't talk about double relation, but suggests that bus_stop should be put > on the way, but the bus stops are not on the road but along it.
Have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRS , for a lot of relations, there are two routes. Often also tagged with a from and to in the relation, although I don't know if that really helps in a program. Regards, Maarten _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
