2010/8/11 Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com> > Renaud MICHEL wrote: > > Le mercredi 11 août 2010 à 13:26, Ben Laenen a écrit : > > > You could fill in the roles of those nodes in the relation of course. > > > I've even seen the bus stop nodes being numbered, so you'd get > > > something like "stop_15" as a role. > > > > The number was used before API0.6, when relations didn't preserve > ordering, > > see > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type=route#Members > > As said before, at least one of the main editors (Potlatch) will destroy > order > and any duplicate members in the relation if you edit it (by e.g. splitting > a > way which is a member of that relation), and therefore we still can't rely > on > it. If we could, there wouldn't be a problem and we could just use one > relation and just add all ways in order. > > I do not understand this. I have used Potlatch and have put *in disorder*all > members of the relation. Then i have used the relationchecker and all members came in the right way. This was for a oneway buss-route. When i tried to put the backward route, all members were in disorder.
This is a normal buss-route: (F=forward / B=backward) B begin --F/B-----<>------F/B----end F Can we discuss further at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Bus_and_tram_lines?? Greetings > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > -- Ivo De Broeck Valleilaan 13 3360 Korbeek-lo Tel (0)16 43 84 93 Gsm +32 486 17 61 13
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be