On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > So looking at the data, I've already found several places where I > think the place of the node isn't really where the building is, > and that maybe some numbers are missing. >
Just some context: If we can add addresses to building we will have added value because AGIV does not do this in most cases. Usually this is just at the 'perceel' level that's why sometimes it seems like this is inaccurate. The tool is from Frédéric Rodrigo (from OSM-FR), I did not create this I just sent him some of the files after I met him at State of the Map :-) The source is wrong obviously and I guess we should also add postalcode and commune name?? AGIV can always take OSM and have a look at our work if they want to. Next year there will also be a presentation about what we did at their annual conference. Hopefully by then we can show off some of our high-quality work! :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
