2013/11/3 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> > On 2013-11-03 01:00, André Pirard wrote : > > On 2013-11-02 23:04, marc bessieres wrote : > > Hello, > > After starting updating the wiki on quality assurance tools. I spent some > time correcting the issues in Brussels. > Now I start finding issues I don't have enough knowledge to fix alone. > I assume it is better to send a mail per issue, so I start here with: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402 > > There is a FIXME in it before its boundaries are not complete. > > For me it looks a lot like: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/58274 > > which has a complete boundary. > But one is Bruxelles, and the other is Ville de Bruxelles. > > I must admit I don't understand the differences. > > My idea would be to merge the extra data of the former into the latter. > And remove the former. > But as they are each in the relation of the other I may miss something > or someone would have done the merge already, so here I am asking for a > piece of advice. > > What should be done with: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402 > > Thank you in advance, > Marc > > > You should certainly not delete anything before you have fully understood > the very complicated administrative structures of our country ;-) You may > notice that we have two Belgiums. > Notice that those boundaries are administrative level 8 and level 9, > certainly not the same thing and that doing as you say is destroying. > I have mapped thousands of kilometers of boundaries in Belgium and I might > have a closer look at that if you want, but not just right now. Boundaries > are complicated things. > > Cheers, > > André. > > > * Ville/Stad* de Bruxelles is in fact a *Commune/Gemeente* made of 4 > anciennes communes/deelgemeenten Brussels, La(e)ken, Neder-Over-Heembeek > and Haren. > What you see incomplete is the first one, but the other ones are > incomplete too. > The boundaries between them are missing. They must be added with the right > name and the four boundaries must be closed over them. My only problem is > finding the missing pieces if I do that, but I know where to look for them. > > Cheers, > > André. > Thank you André for your explanations, I saw the administrative level difference, but I didn't know how to interpret them. Now I do :) If you could find the missing boundaries it'd be perfect! Or tell us where to look for them, may be me or someone else in the community can help there.
Cheers, Marc
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
