On 2013-11-03 14:04, Marc brassieres wrote : > > 2013/11/3 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> > > On 2013-11-03 01:00, André Pirard wrote : >> On 2013-11-02 23:04, marc bessieres wrote : >>> Hello, >>> >>> After starting updating the wiki on quality assurance tools. I >>> spent some time correcting the issues in Brussels. >>> Now I start finding issues I don't have enough knowledge to fix >>> alone. >>> I assume it is better to send a mail per issue, so I start here >>> with: >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402 >>> >>> There is a FIXME in it before its boundaries are not complete. >>> >>> For me it looks a lot like: >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/58274 >>> >>> which has a complete boundary. >>> But one is Bruxelles, and the other is Ville de Bruxelles. >>> >>> I must admit I don't understand the differences. >>> >>> My idea would be to merge the extra data of the former into the >>> latter. And remove the former. >>> But as they are each in the relation of the other I may miss >>> something or someone would have done the merge already, so here >>> I am asking for a piece of advice. >>> >>> What should be done with: >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402 >>> >>> Thank you in advance, >>> Marc >>> >> >> You should certainly not delete anything before you have fully >> understood the very complicated administrative structures of our >> country ;-) You may notice that we have two Belgiums. >> Notice that those boundaries are administrative level 8 and level >> 9, certainly not the same thing and that doing as you say is >> destroying. >> I have mapped thousands of kilometers of boundaries in Belgium >> and I might have a closer look at that if you want, but not just >> right now. Boundaries are complicated things. >> >> Cheers, >> >> André. >> >> > * > Ville/Stad* de Bruxelles is in fact a *Commune/Gemeente* made of 4 > anciennes communes/deelgemeenten Brussels, La(e)ken, > Neder-Over-Heembeek and Haren. > What you see incomplete is the first one, but the other ones are > incomplete too. > The boundaries between them are missing. They must be added with > the right name and the four boundaries must be closed over them. > My only problem is finding the missing pieces if I do that, but I > know where to look for them. > > Cheers, > > André. > > > Thank you André for your explanations, I saw the administrative level > difference, but I didn't know how to interpret them. Now I do :) > If you could find the missing boundaries it'd be perfect! Or tell us > where to look for them, may be me or someone else in the community can > help there. > > Cheers, > Marc > I found the missing borderlines and I replied: > ... I added: > Way: Ville de Bruxelles — Laeken (244722347) > Way: Ville de Bruxelles — Neder-Over-Heembeek (244722351) > Way: Ville de Bruxelles — Haren (244691260) > Way: Laeken — Neder-Over-Heembeek (244722346) > Way: Haren — Neder-Over-Heembeek (244722345) As nobody used those borderlines, I finished the job myself. I added the missing relations for the Brussels municipality sections (level 9). I corrected various errors, including a gap in Brussels Capital borderline.
Cheers, André.
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
