<I used the place= node as admin_centre. That's also the one that I moved. Should there be a difference between the two ? <As for the two relations: I'm still fighting nominatim. I want all the street(segments) within the Muizen area to return 2812 as post code. In Germany they use the dedicated boundary=postal_code. This is also what <was recommended by someone on a similar question on help.openstreetmap.org. <So I tried that. That's what I'm trying to do in Ghent, and it doesn't work. I've defined the "deelgemeenten" with their postal code (actually as a boundary=administrative), but there seem to be some postal codes "hardcoded" in Nominatim, which seem to have preference over the postal code bounbdaries. Examples : Waterkluiskaai in Sint-Amandsberg still has postal code 9050, although in reality it has 9040 : http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=waterkluiskaai#map=17/51.04681/3.7 5473 Sint-Amandsberg has 9040, which is correct : http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=sint-amandsberg#map=17/51.04681/3. 75473 9040 is NOT hardcoded in Nominatim : http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=9040#map=17/51.04681/3.75473 9050 is : http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=9050#map=17/51.04681/3.75473 So everything near the 9050 "node" will get the postal code 9050, regardless of boundaries : http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=tarbotstraat#map=17/51.04557/3.746 83 while Tarbotstraat is within the 9000 boundary, but close to the "9050 virtual node" The only solution is to add the postal_code on street level.
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
