When I read the licence file it's the same conditions as the CRAB dataset. There is an obligation to mention the source, just add it to the list of sources on the wiki and specify that it's about borders.
Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > At least the shapefile is clear about the license, and you can > just open that in josm. You need the "OpenData" plugin for it. > > See: > > https://download.agiv.be/Producten/Detail?id=10&title=Voorlopig_referentiebestand_gemeentegrenzen > > Since the WMS is just a rending of that information, I don't think > it's a problem to use it. > > > Kurt > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:35:17AM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote: > > I'll try to get the wms layer for the boundaries and adapt the boundary > to > > the one from AGIV (or are we not allowed to use that ?) > > > > m > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> > wrote: > > > > > On 05-12-13 05:54, Marc Gemis wrote: > > > > > >> Another question related to this boundary. Originally I did not touch > the > > >> boundary between Mechelen en Bonheiden. I just reused it for the > > >> Muizen-boundary. I now noticed that the Bonheidensteenweg ( > > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146650425) was partially in > > >> Muizen-Mechelen and Bonheiden. So I moved the boundary at that point, > i.e. > > >> moved 1 point by merging it with the streetname change point. > > >> > > >> But now I wonder whether the boundary should not be over the stream > > >> Boeimeerbeek. That makes more sense to me. In this case the street > name > > >> change should occur in the middle of the bridge. > > >> > > >> I just checked AGIV, there is no (street) name on the bridge, but the > > >> street names are different on both sides of the stream. Also, the > name of > > >> the stream is Vrouwvliet according to AGIV. > > >> > > >> Can we improve the boundaries with data from AGIV ? Is there a WMS > layer > > >> or shape files we can use ? > > >> > > >> > > >> m > > >> > > > > > > I was born and raised in Bonheiden, I always thought that was the > border, > > > you could actually spot the border between Mechelen(Muizen) and > Bonheiden > > > for years by looking at the quality difference of the road. I only > visit > > > it once in a while and now it seems the road has been redone. But it > used > > > to be pretty close to the bridge over the Boeimeerbeek you mention. > > > > > > The road in Bonheiden is called the Muizensteenweg, in Muizen that > road is > > > called Bonheidensteenweg. By looking at the map alone I think that the > > > point on the road should not be merged with the administrative boundary > > > like it is now. I noticed someone messed with that area a good while > back > > > and he lacked some mapping knowledge. > > > > > > That bridge is the border, atleast by popular knowledge. > > > > > > > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Talk-be mailing list > > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-be mailing list > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
