Marc, situation 1 should do the job, without splitting the way after the intersection. There is clearly a situation of obvious connectivity here ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:It%27s_so_funny)
Cheers, Johan 2014-09-11 12:04 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > I've been trying to map destinations on primary roads as well. Therefore I > asked the following question on the help forum a couple of weeks ago, but > never got an answer: > > I want to tag the destinations on a sign like > http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2014/20140810-Herentals/i-ZQhq2MT/A It is > located here <http://osm.org/go/0Ep4vj5pV-?m=&relation=3894019>. You see > it on your right before a crossing with traffic_signals, while driving on a > primary road. > > I know the wiki pages on destination > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination>, the destination > sign relation > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign> and some > proposed extensions > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details> > . > > However, I'm not sure about the best way to map the example sign. I see > the following possibilities > > 1. as destination-tag on the way after the crossing > 2. as a destination relation > 3. as destination:lane on the way before the crossing > > or a combination of the above ? > > In case of 1 - the destination tag, do I have to split the way after the > intersection ? Or do I let it extend as far as the current way ? > > I do not consider the exit_to tag which is sometimes used in the USA. > > > What you might not see is that there is one lane for left turns, one for > through and the right most lane is for through and right. > > Any thoughts on that ? > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> > wrote: > >> Hi Sander, >> >> I've been thinking about your statements. Although I think you are not >> incorrect stating it should be easy to enter, I think your requirements >> to not use josm at all for this (with or without plugins) are a bit to >> demanding. >> >> I'm a text console kind of person, all day long. I love the vi(m) editor >> but I'm not so inclined into xml-diving some OSM change files. >> Maybe I misunderstand this, but a good plugin in JOSM would probably >> help a lot in taking the edge of editing. >> >> There are other things that are hard to edit. Try the new speed_camera >> scheme for example: although I get what they are trying to do, it's >> complicated and for a camera that does 2 jobs (red light + speed trap) >> you have to add a single relation for each. >> >> Although this might signal a possible bad design, it doesn't make it a >> bad one by default. So, I'm not convinced on the 'clearly doing >> something wrong'. On the other hand, it's not a great design either. >> >> The only thing that I think is in the wrong place are the translations >> of a destination. (technically then). But I have to remind myself all >> the time it's not a relational database design I'm discussing. >> >> I do aggree on the subject that smaller roads are probably more >> important for all the reasons you state. >> >> Glenn >> >> >> >> On 11-09-14 10:23, Sander Deryckere wrote: >> > Marc, you are right that I don't like the tag because of missing tools. >> > But on the other hand, I think tags should be easy to edit, even without >> > tools. If adding the tags becomes harder than surveying, we're clearly >> > doing something wrong. >> >> ... >> >> > Since we have more small roads than motorways, the tags should be easy >> > enough for anyone to add. Without having to use JOSM with some extra >> > plugins. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Sander >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be