I would suggest this tagging scheme because access = private is wrong : access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder bicycle=yes description=Jaagpad highway=track mofa=yes source=survey surface=unpaved tracktype=grade2 traffic_sign=BE:C3,BE:Type-IV vehicle=no website=http://www.wenz.be/nl/burger/Jaagpaden/
This probably covers it all, It has indeed passed this same list a few times. It is important not to name it as they have no official name. This is from : https://plus.google.com/photos/101291905535513785025/albums/6019150774027442577?banner=pwa Glenn On 07-12-14 08:19, Marc Gemis wrote: > This topic pops up from time to time, see > e.g. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-July/004376.html > . Don't remember the outcome, besides that they are not cycleways and do > not have names in general. > > If I would start completely afresh I would propose: > highway=service > service=towpath > access=private > bicycle=yes > foot=yes > surface=asphatl/earth/ > maxspeed=30 > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
