> I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in
> the GRB. I'm thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB
>  building shape is just wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not 
> perfect, it's a complex building) and 3D mapped. 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.18741/3.20325

Yes of course. that's why I call it a merge. since this process
encompasses using AGIV sat layer, and GRB layer in JOSM itself, it's
not hard to see where GRB has got it wrong.

No need to worry about losing good OSM data, when done right..

Glenn

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to