It's just pretty tempting to start increasing the amount of data one uploads and to stop verifying data thoroughly, especially if you haven't found problems for awhile. This has nothing to do with procedures, tools, etc.
You do not have this problem when you have to draw each house yourself, (although in the end you might be just drawing squares instead of detailed houses.) m On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshau...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Maybe we should also foresee procedures for cases where it's obvious >> people take the data and just 'run with it'? If needed we shouldn't hesitate >> to revert changesets. Who's going to follow up on that though? reverts >> should ideally happen as quickly as possible. > > > Didn't we agree we would only allow a limited number of people access to the > tool and the converted data? To prevent exactly this kind of thing from > happening... > > If I remember correctly the requirement was to make your OSM username known > and follow at least a google hangout session about the procedure to follow. > So a minimum requirement would be to have had contact in person or via > hangout with one of us? > > That being said, I agree we should not be afraid to revert changesets with > improperly imported data. > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Best regards, > > Ben Abelshausen > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
