On 15-12-16 05:44, Marc Gemis wrote: > I'm really looking forward to read the procedure on how you guys came up. > You might have been lucky that I couldn't make it , now you only have > to ignore my annoying mails :-)
No, not at all. The church-issue was brought up without your help :) > I fail to see how documentation will prevent any participant from just > dumping the data from GRB into OSM without any check what so ever. The > same happened in The Netherlands where destroyed buildings were still > imported and not-yet existing house numbers where dumped in the dunes. The rule is you need to use the plugin to merge geometries, like this no history will be deleted , hence you can roll those back. But we aggree you need some kind of formal training before getting unleashed on the data. So we will give workshops etc, possibly hangouts. > A model import does not introduce errors that could be avoided by > simply looking at aerial imagery Does, or does not ? > > I've been working almost daily with the GRB data now for 6 months (*) > or so and have a pretty good idea how much work it takes to make this > a model import. I fail to see how 20-25 people can accomplish this is > a year, unless they really spend a lot of hours on it. I did Stekene and surroundings in a month (pretty large part in fact). It goes really fast when there are no houses yet, where buildings exist it will go a bit slower. But it's not an import, the end result needs to be better than OSM and GRB seperately, it will be if we do it right. > But I am probably to critical right now and have to see what process / > documentation you guys came up with. > > so I shut up now and wait Think I asked for feedback on plenty of occasions, consider your job is well done and I prefer an early critic over a late one :) Glenn _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
