Paul - No issues on either of those points. All I really want is a clear definition but your response provides neither.
Could you please elaborate as to: 1. What would be an definition as to what you see a trunk route would be? 2. For the Lower Mainland what "unexpected routes" would foresee? I'm just trying to understand your point of view to get insightful perspective. However, presently OSM is using a government list to determine trunk routes. For some strange it doesn't apply to BC according to OSM. So that raises the question why does OSM contributors treat BC differently then the rest of Canada on this point. Cheers, Ken On Jan 28, 2016 4:11 PM, "Paul Norman" <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > On 1/28/2016 10:31 AM, Ken Wuschke wrote: > > So a suggestion to a definition for trunk routes in Canada could be a > simple as: > > *A highway=trunk is a roadway that is a part of the National Highway > System as defined by the Council of Ministers Responsible for > Transportation and Highway Safety and is found in annually updated document > called **Canada’s National Highway System Annual Report.* > > > I don't see that we should be depending on a government definition within > OSM. Additionally, this would lead to unexpected results if you look at the > feeder routes in the lower mainland. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
