As gordon said, merging them would be a donting task, especially the more north you go. Also if you do make a massive forest by merging them all we'll have fun trying to find the relation that defines that forest, because if you download data in the middle of the relation with out hitting one of it's children it doesn't show up in JOSM
On Aug 26, 2016 5:41 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-25 02:07 PM, Gordon Dewis wrote: > > > > There is value to having them in OSM, we just have to find a better way > > to do them, or live with "seams" at the edges of Canvec tiles. > > But if they'll (all?) have to be redone once we work out a better way of > doing forests, aren't the existing tile imports a liability? They make > any future repair much more difficult. > > There are also many instances where the landuse polygon doesn't clip to > the water body correctly, like this: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263860160#map=16/46.8979/-82.5383 > > I don't think there's much import activity going on with the CanVec > data. Last edits from the typical importers was over a year ago. > > cheers, > Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
