Sur la page wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Canada_Highway, on voit
que des panneaux Transcanada sont ajoutés sur le côté de la route. Cependant,
au Québec comme en Ontario, les panneaux de navigation au-dessus de la route ne
font pas de façon générale référence à la Transcanadienne.
Comme le dit James, la Transcanadienne, c'est une méta-donnée. Une relation de
type route permettrait de décrire ce réseau.
Il serait aussi possible d'ajouter une référence à la Transcanadienne dans la
clé ref.
Exemple ref=417; TC(TC pour Transcanadienne).
Exemple où trois routes partagent un segment, ref=35; 104; 133.
voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128245108#map=16/45.3227/-73.2309
Au dela du rendu sur la carte, ces références sont-elles utiles aux outils de
navigation routière? En ajoutant TC, est-ce que l'on indiquerait à chaque fois,
Continuez sur la route 417, Transcanadienne ? Le risque est d'ajouter de la
confusion dans les instructions de navigation.
Quel est l'objectif de l'équipe de Telenav pour harmoniser les références à la
Transcanadienne et ajouter les infos proposées ?
Pierre
Le lundi 26 mars 2018 12 h 21 min 52 s HAE, James <james2...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
http://openstreetview.org/details/23187/73
No trans-canada naming in sight because the trans-canada is a meta road
composed of multiple highways. See road sign in OSV.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:07 PM Kevin Farrugia, <kevinfarru...@gmail.com> wrote:
The proper name for the highways that are under the Kings Highway system
(400-Series included) is "Highway xxx" or Highway xx, with the exception of the
QEW. Highways signs and government data follow the same rules.
The Trans-Canada as a name/deaignation is almost inconsequential in Ontario and
to Ontarians.
-------
Kevin Farrugia
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 11:46 AM Viajero Perdido,
<viajero.perdido.spam.buc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18-03-26 05:33 AM, talk-ca-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:33:14 +0000
> From: James <james2...@gmail.com>
> To: "Olivia Robu - (p)" <olivia.r...@telenav.com>
> Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research
> Message-ID:
> <cank4qi_u9uveodoc8try-mic-xgxsxbuuv0n9pssjo0v+jr...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> highway 417 should be tagged as highway 417 and not principally transcanada
> way as this is how it's known locally. It can be tagged in transcanada
> relation, but it's mainly known as the 417
I disagree. "Highway 417" is a low-value name, because the "ref" tag
should already contain the number, causing numbered shields to be
shown. "Highway 417" is just a verbosification of the number.
"Trans-Canada Highway", however, is a real name; it belongs in the name
field.
This way, most maps would show both name and number.
To me, the (completely separate) issue is whether ordinary numbered
highways should have a name tag at all, "Highway nnn", or simply nothing
because "ref" takes care of it. I've been able to find no guidance on
this, and I've looked. I've been leaving "Highway nnn" in place when I
see it, which is most of the time. But that's another discussion for
another day.
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
