On 21/07/09 10:10, Peter Miller wrote: > I am not hearing anyone saying we should not revert all Liam123's edits > for which he is still the most recent editor. Can someone do it?
That will be up to the Data Working Group surely? > Should we set up a vandalism response process and team for England, or > the East of England, GB or UK which can deal with UK related vandalism? > One reason for doing this on at a territorial level is because issues > will be different in different territories - the middle east and Cyprus > have different issues from this part of the wold. Possibly we start with > the GB area (to match with talk-gb) and then consider breaking it out to > England, Scotland and Wales at a later point if necessary and possibly > into regions but only if there is a good reason. It's called the Data Working Group and it already exists and is due to meet in the near future - I assume this will be on the agenda. > To be clear, we should only apply a revert to malicious edits; newbies > errors should be tweeked and dealt with much more sensitively (speaking > as one who has broken the coastline and sunk the east coast on more than > one occasion). I'm still not clear on what this user has been doing and what the evidence is that it is indeed malicious. This whole thread started with the statement that "Liam123 is still active unfortunately" which implies there is some history, but I have no memory of that history and there doesn't seem to have been any clear statement in this thread of what he has been doing and why it is thought to be malicious. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
