On Wednesday 02 June 2010, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: > I for one would miss a publicly-deployed version. The matching of strings > really makes a difference between your data and the ITO one: > > 1. in well-mapped areas one finds a few places which either have not been > surveyed or require a re-survey, whereas the ITO comparison layer largely > shows finger trouble. So far I've found them completely complementary: yours > for the big picture, ITO locator comparison for the nitty-gritty of getting > fluff out of the data. > > 2. in areas with large numbers of nonames the ITO layer just has too much > data (and I have been trying to bang in names N of Liverpool). > > 3. Data from Musical Chairs gives a better handle on completeness, but when > compared with the ITO figures we can assess quality/validation as well.
Well either way, I'll be dumping the code for whatever I do up on bitbucket for anyone to use. robert. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
