On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:25:31PM +0000, Ed Avis wrote: > > I would suggest that whoever removed Mascall Avenue from the map should have > mapped what replaced it - a brownfield site or whatever - to avoid future > confusion.
For what it's worth, we did - there's now a landuse=residential; access=private polygon around the area. Now it's open, we could probably infer the building polygon as well - what was Mascall Avenue goes straight through the middle of this. s _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
