On 24 January 2014 14:25, SK53 <sk53....@gmail.com> wrote: > By all means say "OSMf/LWG consider that OSGB OGL data can be included in > OSM, but > I personally avoid doing so ..."
But as far I I know, that would be incorrect. According to Michael Collinson's post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-July/015028.html "LWG view on use of data in OSM under OS OpenData License: Yes: OS OpenData product except CodePoint No: CodePoint (a Royal Mail response to Chris Hill needs further investigation) You need to formally ask: Any other dataset published under the OS OpenData License by other organisations, such as English Heritage, (or by OS if any)." So unless something has changed since then that I'm not aware of, LWG consider that data licensed under the OS OpenData Licence *cannot* be included in OSM, unless it's either one of the specific OS OpenData products (except CodePoint Open) or you formally ask for permission from the rights holders. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
