2014-01-25 SK53 <sk53....@gmail.com>: > Agree, we also have both OGL 1.0 (e.g., Natural England) and OGL 2.0 (e.g, > OSGB). > > I've been reading the licenses again, and I think the main sticking point is > the viral attribution clause. > [...snip...]
I don't want to divert from Jerry's main points, but I just want to make sure no-one misreads his reply the same way I just did. The OGL does not have any viral attribution clause - which happens to be the point I was making in my reply to Matthijs earlier today! It's the Ordnance Survey's version of OGL which has a viral attribution clause. I agree with Jerry's analysis, but I note that there's no _viral_ attribution when using data that is under the standard OGL (and is uncontaminated by any second-hand OSGB content). Best Dan _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb