On 13/08/14 11:36, Will Phillips wrote: > 2. I don't agree that tagging only postcode and 'addressable object' is > a good idea. To convert that into a full address requires access to a > closed database. Surely the whole point about OSM is creating useful > data that is open? At the moment we don't even have sufficient open data > available to add an accurate postcode to every address. I hope more > address data will be made available under an open licence in the future, > but at the moment we have to work with what we have got.
But the point here is if postcode is made a standard part of tagging addresses then the open data holes will naturally be filled. Currently there are a number of third party sources which could be pressed into use to fill the gap, but it's making them normal use on the ground that will solve the problem ... We do have a lot of postcode data already available but it's perhaps surprising that many objects that have their own postcode are not currently included when that information is available in the original sources. I've just added Ragley Hall postcode but a number of the locations I look at Monday it was missing. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb