Hockley Viaduct near Winchester does get rendered: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108241777#map=18/51.03628/-1.32230
but probably because there is a path on it. Would that be a workaround for you Andy? Thomas On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:25 AM, SK53 <sk53....@gmail.com> wrote: > Bridges and other significant remaining infrastructure of railways tagged > as railway=abandoned ceased to be rendered on the Standard rendering some > time ago. There was a degree of dissension with this decision: > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542. > > Certainly I recall a few grumps to that effect on the osm-gb IRC channel: > not least because of the potential value of such routes for walkers & > cyclists. > > Jerry > > On 13 July 2015 at 08:53, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > >> The significant (and massive) disused railway viaduct near Thrapston: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970 >> >> does not render on our default map: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.3914/-0.5433 >> >> despite being a significant and very visible landmark: >> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_opulentfish/2870819874/ >> >> I don't want fudge things to just "tag for the renderer", but is there >> a relevant tag missing, or should we change the rendering styles to >> show such objects? >> >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> @pigsonthewing >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
