Designation tag is already is use to discriminate between LNRs & NNRs (I'm not quite sure what partiticular status LNRs have but it is referred to as a designation on the Magic site). Otherwise no: most NRs will be a mosaic of different physical types, even woods will have rides, ponds, and little meadows. Parks are a special case: most will think of them as parks rather than NRs (although visits will be for the nature), which is why I was wondering about a nature_reserve=yes tag rather than a duplicate way. I also suspect that most such cases will be in cities: although the odd country park may figure.
Jerry On 1 November 2015 at 21:42, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you think there is a need to separate the legal (i.e. LNR, NNR) from > the "physical" (landuse of grass, wood etc or leisure=park) by making use > of the designation tag? We ended up doing this for rights of way. > > Regards, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
