Thanks for the simplification of that huge wiki down to 2 tags - I can cope with that!
The protected planet website looks like a useful resource but unfortunately it has this copyright statement : © ProtectedPlanet 2014-2015. All rights reserved. So we shouldn't use it. So what do I use as a source for Natura 2000 status? Also isn't the tag leisure=nature_reserve? Regards Brian On 26 October 2015 at 12:23, tshrub <my-email-confirmat...@online.de> wrote: > Hey Brian, > > Brian Prangle schrieb: > >> Do we need to tag Natura 2000 SACs and SPAs? I've looked at the >> protected_area wiki page and quite frankly lost the will to live. From >> looking at taginfo the tagging schema doesn't appear to be too popular >> in the UK. >> > > someone from the UK should try to "familiarise" or incorporate Britains > tagging schema into the table? < > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Nature-protected-areas > > > > > by areal access or action restictions, you have different types or layers. > For example: a SAC often emerged out of an (old) nature reserve, so a SAC > commonly covers and overlap(!) one. And those both might again covered > (partial) from another type... > > you know that site: <http://www.protectedplanet.net/> > there are too britain areas and you can deviate protect_classes > > > > a SAC would be > boundary=protected_area > + protect_class=97 > > for nature reserves > + protect_class=4 > I still use in addition landuse=nature_reserve because of visualisation > > > > regards, > tshrub > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
