2017-01-18 13:51 GMT+00:00 Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>: > Hi > > Do people reside & sleep in the park or nursery? > If 'no' then is it really residential?
...! > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential > > As the database becomes more detailed/accurate the "granularity" gets > smaller. Entities like 'residential' will have less blanket coverage, items > will be individually tagged Which is what you note in another of your posts: > "And the address of the nursery also includes "Queen's Park Court": " > So the cover-all named residential area becomes redundant. If you're aiming to remove the redundancy from OSM... good luck ;) It makes perfect sense to me that there can be an identifiable area whose name is "Queen's Park Court" and also that "Queen's Park Court" would be a part of the address for some item within it. Cheers Dan > Regarding the nursery I'd redraw the residential around it, map it's > boundary fence as amenity=kindergarten, transfer all the address data to > that polygon & tag the building with building=kindergarten. This is how the > vast majority of the schools were tagged in the recent GB quarterly project. > > Cheers > DaveF > > On 18/01/2017 11:24, Derick Rethans wrote: >> >> It's part of the residential estate, so I disagree with that. cheers, >> Derick > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
