If only it could “snap” to points, but not join, where the way is an administrative boundary.
> On 13 Dec 2018, at 11:39, Andy G Wood <a...@bas.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 13 December 2018 11:22:58 GMT Mark Goodge wrote: >>> On 12/12/2018 23:11, ael wrote: >>> This is perhaps slightly off topic, but this habit of some of sharing >>> nodes causes me many problems. When I am updating roads and other >>> features from fairly accurate gps surveys, I often find the I have all >>> these tangled boundaries about which I know little. It is a huge pain >>> to duplicate nodes to separate ways before I can adjust just the feature >>> that I have surveyed. I confess that my patience often runs out, and I >>> just drag the other stuff along with my updates, thinking that the >>> mappers who shared the nodes in the first place get what they deserve >>> >>> :-). >> >> I agree. [...] > > I also wholeheartedly agree. > However I think this problem is not helped by the fact that the iD editor, by > default, will snap to nearest points. You may be able to change this (?), > but > I have kept with the defaults, so this will be a "feature" that many mappers > just go with as the accepted norm. > > Andy. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
