I have used farmland=pasture and farmland=arable to cover these cases.

Other cases could be farmland=vineyard.

Sadly too many mappers use meadow to describe pasture which is a shame as it 
would be good to be able to find real meadows. Obviously these cannot easily be 
armchaired.

I don't really understand why meadow was hijacked. 

Phil (trigpoint) 

On Friday, 24 May 2019, Gregory Marler wrote:
> What is going on with landuse=farmland, and what are we going to do?
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
> 
> It had a classic "map for the renderer" and "no blank spots on the map"
> problem. Armchair mappers found it important to map large swathes of
> farmland, which I don't think added much. The default style helped by
> making it a very subtle colour.
> It was always land that is used for tillage(crops) or pasture(animals).
> There was some thought to add tagging of crop=yes or animal=* to be more
> specific if desired.
> 
> I have then started seeing people map a lot of landuse=meadow. I disagreed,
> but it seems the wiki page was changed in November. I don't think there was
> any discussion, and Harry even clarified the wording in December.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Alanduse%3Dfarmland&type=revision&diff=1689614&oldid=1663478
> 
> To me, meadow is a different to the common farm fields that have animals
> in. A meadow is likely longer grass, or encouraged to get long. It might be
> for flowers/wildlife rather than animals.
> 
> Most importantly, this is going to cause confusion and disparity over what
> is being mapped and how/why.
> 
> From Durham,
> Gregory.
> 
> -- 
> Gregory Marler
>

-- 
Sent from my Sailfish device
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to