On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 04:18:02:PM +0000, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 16/03/2020 15:36, ael wrote: > > > > There has now been had one short reply essentially admitting tagging for > > the renderer. I haven't replied as yet, but Andy has. > > In this case it looks like the offending data's been removed, though the > tiles haven't rerendered yet (due to the site being busy). If there are
I have only just got around to looking in more detail, and discovered that it is much worse than I had realised: vandalism. I have taken waypoints on nearly all of the individual stones, and then refined those positions with waypoint averaging on multiple visits. I now discover that this user has deleted that information and put new points from who knows where. I started replying to the changset comment before I had discovered that horror, and possibly failed to remain polite after it came to light. So it is vandalism. I will see what reply I get. Meanwhile I think everyone should check his other edits to historic sites. ael _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
