What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we
tag all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is
"designation=public_footpath" enough?
On 2020-07-10 13:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
> highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset in Potlatch
> 1.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
> I got a changeset comment querying the edit.
>
> * I note you have removed foot=yes from highway=footway. My understanding is
> that the default for a footway is foot=designated, but designated requires an
> explicit sign. the paths on Wimbledon Common do not have an explicit sign,
> but are legally accessible, hence foot=yes. Perhaps osmose is wrong.
> * Any comments?
> * --
> * Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
