I think the permissive tag is due to it being yet another perceived public space which is actually private, so there’s no public right of way.
Would access=permissive or access:bicycle=permissive be sensible? Or is that also mangling tagging conventions. I genuinely don’t know! Gareth > On 3 Sep 2020, at 10:42, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 03.09.20 11:29, Robert Skedgell wrote: >> I believe the most appropriate base tagging, following the duck tagging >> principle for highway=*, for most of the paths in QEOP would be: >> highway=cycleway + segregated=no + bicycle=permissive + foot=permissive > > I think that highway=cycleway implies bicycle=yes so adding a > bicycle=permissive would be confusing? > > In my mental picture the combination highway=cycleway+foot=permissive > means: "This is a way made and intended for bicycles. But pedestrians > are also tolerated." - which might well be correct given that there > seems to be a lot of cycle-related infrastructure around. > > To be honest, given the rules you cite, I would be tempted to use > highway=footway+bicycle=yes OR the dreaded > highway=path+bicycle=yes+foot=yes - but I haven't seen how it looks on > the ground. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb