I've made extensive use of these tiles for numbering tasks in London E15 and E7. But you are right that more up to date material is needed. Bing gives me the more modern building outlines, and I then do some spot checks of the NLS-sourced housenumbers when I survey the newer buildings.
But I don't recall any instances where NLS was 'wrong' for buildings that are still standing. Maybe the odd 45 vs 45a etc. --- https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 6:47 PM, Mark Goodge wrote: > > > On 30/10/2020 18:37, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: > > > > > > > > Oct 30, 2020, 16:28 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > > > > It has come to my attention that the "Town Plan" map from 1944-1967 > > in NLS is available freely. > > > > What are its licensing terms? > > > > "available freely" does not mean "compatible with OSM license" > > It's out of copyright, so there aren't any licensing issues in deriving > data from it. > > I would, though, be a little reluctant to use it as a basis for > wholesale numbering without any supporting local knowledge or survey. > House numbers can, and sometimes do, change, particularly when streets > are renamed or rebuilt. So you can't be 100% certain that a house number > in the 1950s is the same number it is now, even if the building is still > the same. > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
