Just to add by the way, in a country like netherlands "cycleways" are paved paths dedicated to cycles. You can't walk on there because there are also sidewalks to walk on. E.g.:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pAL4yr927e4/maxresdefault.jpg -- 10 Dec 2020, 14:08 by tonyo...@gmail.com: > > Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually > banned? > > > Unfortunately yes - > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295 > > > Quite clear signage - Mapillary - > > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.66933432657343&lng=-2.6290113968031967&z=17&pKey=_ir_HmYAIa4H0rnj1JrO8A&focus=photo> > > > When I walk there I take my chances on the illegal walking along a > cycleway rather than the 50 mph dual carriageway where it is legal to > walk. > > > Tony Shield - TonyS999 > > . > > On 10/12/2020 12:47, Martin Wynne wrote: > >>> My reasons for changing it, is that it is shared use path with a >>> greater number of people of foot than bicycle (about 5:2) >>> >> >> Many public bridleways have many more walkers and cyclists using it >> than actual horse-riders. But are still mapped as bridleways. >> >> Map it as a cycleway, unless it is a public bridleway, in which case >> map it as bridleway. You are mapping the status, not the actual usage. >> >> My feeling is that a highway should be mapped at the highest level of >> permitted usage. The assumption is that pedestrians can go almost >> anywhere anyway. Motorways excepted. >> >> Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually >> banned? >> >> cheers, >> >> Martin. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>> >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
