That's weird.
Save for some tactile paving what's the difference between North & South?
DaveF
On 10/12/2020 14:08, Tony Shield wrote:
/Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
banned?
/
Unfortunately yes - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295
Quite clear signage - Mapillary -
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.66933432657343&lng=-2.6290113968031967&z=17&pKey=_ir_HmYAIa4H0rnj1JrO8A&focus=photo
//
When I walk there I take my chances on the illegal walking along a
cycleway rather than the 50 mph dual carriageway where it is legal to
walk.
Tony Shield - TonyS999
.
On 10/12/2020 12:47, Martin Wynne wrote:
My reasons for changing it, is that it is shared use path with a
greater number of people of foot than bicycle (about 5:2)
Many public bridleways have many more walkers and cyclists using it
than actual horse-riders. But are still mapped as bridleways.
Map it as a cycleway, unless it is a public bridleway, in which case
map it as bridleway. You are mapping the status, not the actual usage.
My feeling is that a highway should be mapped at the highest level of
permitted usage. The assumption is that pedestrians can go almost
anywhere anyway. Motorways excepted.
Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
banned?
cheers,
Martin.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
