That still doesn't answer the addr: tag question. I don't think we'd normally expect consumers to need to do such detailed geometry parsing for address to interpretation.
I think we need a firmer scheme for divisions of privately managed stuff e.g. business parks apartment 'complexes' and the like would be useful. On Sun, 20 Dec 2020, 13:45 ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB, < talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > What you do is give the outline way "buildong=terrace" and > "name=<NAME_OF_TERRACE>" and all the houses with "building:part=house". The > software can then tell that all those houses are part of the terrace called > <NAME_OF_TERRACE> > > -- > > > 20 Dec 2020, 17:30 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > > On 2020-12-20 18:21, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote: > > Tag the houses with addr:place maybe? > > > IMHO a house is not a place > > > Or, better method is to use the alternative terrace taggong scheme where > each house is tagged as building:part=house within a larger > building=terrace. (Terracer plugin lets you do this if you check "keep > outline way") > > > > That allows the building to be split into parts, but does it tell us how > to put a distinct address on each part? > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
