Much appreciated folks.

Can you let me know when the formal approval is given. I'll set up a ticket
booth to track numbers then.

Thanks again,
Dave

On 11 Sep 2017 20:08, "Tadeusz Cantwell" <t4d...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As a member of Tog I can come in early on the 21st to open up and put my
> name down to host the event.
> Tad
>
> On 11 September 2017 at 13:39, Dave Corley <davecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeffrey,
> >
> > A 4pm finish might not be a bad idea especially for those traveling.
> Would
> > it be possible to start earlier? Say 10 or 11? I'm just mindful that
> there
> > will be a lot of things to go through and I would like to leave time for
> >  discussions. On the other hand, I don't want to inconvenience you (or
> > other Tog members) too much as you are doing us a favour.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Jeffrey Roe <tdr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There is an internal event on the 21st that starts at 4pm. So you
> > > would need to finish up then or run it on the 14th.
> > > An event takes 5 days for Tog to approve and you need a member to host
> > > you.  I could possible do the 21st but you would need someone else to
> > > host if you wanted the 14th.
> > > Jeffrey Roe,
> > > www.tog.ie
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11 September 2017 at 10:41, Dave Corley <davecor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Rounding back on this again. Between the responses on the mail list,
> > > > Facebook and previous surveys, the general consensus is to go ahead
> > with
> > > > this.
> > > >
> > > > Martin, sorry for not replying to you earlier, but I wanted to stay
> > quiet
> > > > and see what others thought first. To your point, yes, its possible
> to
> > do
> > > > everything I stated outside of a formal body, but given we are an
> > > informal
> > > > grouping of similarly minded folks for over a decade and
> organisational
> > > > interest/involvement is decreasing rather than increasing, I think
> its
> > > > necessary to do this if we are to ever become "more". Your comment
> > about
> > > > there being a functioning group is bang on the money too. Right now I
> > > feel
> > > > there is such a thing, and the infrastructure is more or less in
> place
> > (
> > > we
> > > > are starting in a much better position than our UK counterparts).
> > > >
> > > > That being said, after the original survey questions a year ago, the
> > mail
> > > > list and facebook responses and some private feedback, I think, as
> > usual,
> > > > the distance factor is the biggest hurdle. With that in mind I think
> > its
> > > > best to change from a series of meetings on the subject, to a single
> > one,
> > > > where several of us come together and blitz the main items:
> > > >
> > > > - Constitution
> > > > - Memorandum of association
> > > > - Articles of association
> > > > - Interim board
> > > > - etc etc
> > > >
> > > > What I looking to achieve is to get to a point where we are 90% of
> the
> > > way
> > > > there. Afterwards, everything achieved would be put up online for
> > > feedback,
> > > > comment and to close out any remaining items.
> > > >
> > > > I'm hoping a single session of 5-6 hours should be good enough for
> > this,
> > > > say from 12-5/6 on a Saturday. I'm hoping that by limiting this to a
> > > single
> > > > day, to get a much larger group to participate.
> > > >
> > > > In order to keep things moving through the day, I'm going to try
> > organise
> > > > some sponsorship of refreshments.
> > > >
> > > > Would the Tog folks on this list know if Tog is available on a
> Saturday
> > > in
> > > > Oct? Say the 14th or 21st. If not, I'll try sort something else.
> > > >
> > > > Once a date and location is set, I'll set up an invite page, just to
> be
> > > > able to track numbers attending in the event I get sponsorship for
> > > > refreshments.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I agree with Dave, it would be good to get a formal OSM body set up.
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, for doing more mapping events, you don't need a formal body,
> but
> > > >> you do it you want to be an OSMF local chapter, and I suspect it
> would
> > > >> be easier to talk to government bodies (or big orgs) if you're from
> an
> > > >> official body.
> > > >>
> > > >> And who knows, setting it up might be kick up the arse for some of
> us!
> > > >>
> > > >> Since I'm in Germany, I can't come to any of the events. 😞😞😞 But
> > I'll
> > > >> help how I can... I was involved with setting up TOG, which was
> > > >> originally an unincorporated association (don't do that!) and is
> now a
> > > >> DAC (designed activity company(?))
> > > >>
> > > >> On 14/08/17 03:52, Dave Corley wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> First, I want to apologise, this is a long email, but if you are at
> > all
> > > >>> interested in moving OSM in Ireland to the next level, please read
> on
> > > and
> > > >>> give your feedback when you're done.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Efforts to get the OSM Ireland group set up as a legal entity and
> > > >>> established as a recognised chapter have never really got out of
> the
> > > >>> starting blocks for us, mainly because it's an exceptionally long,
> > > boring
> > > >>> process to get it all done.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Back when Rory gave the Townlands presentation at a Sotm or two
> ago,
> > I
> > > >>> contacted everyone who took part and asked a number of questions to
> > > allow
> > > >>> for some stats to be included in the presentation. I asked a few
> > > questions
> > > >>> specifically around the topic of setting something up properly. If
> I
> > > >>> recall
> > > >>> correctly, all but one were interested in joining an official OSM
> > > Ireland,
> > > >>> but less than half wanted to be involved in setting it up. But that
> > > ratio
> > > >>> is to be expected. If I'm honest, it was a lot higher than I
> > originally
> > > >>> expected.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What I would love to see is a functioning OSM Ireland body which,
> at
> > an
> > > >>> absolute minimum, could do the following
> > > >>>
> > > >>>     - Scheduling regular meet up's - These would have some
> > organisation
> > > >>>     around them e.g. guest speakers, break out groups, objectives
> > etc.
> > > >>> This
> > > >>>     could be monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly, doesn't matter, just
> > > even
> > > >>>     setting up a schedule and sticking to it would be a great
> > > achievement
> > > >>>     - Work on increasing the qty of daily contributors - Some
> simple
> > > >>> things
> > > >>>     like automating messages to first time mappers, or a tool to
> > ensure
> > > >>> every
> > > >>>     new contributor's edits are reviewed for accuracy/vandalism
> etc.
> > > >>> Basically,
> > > >>>     just setting up some structure around it to ensure we engage
> with
> > > new
> > > >>> folks
> > > >>>     in the most efficient and effective ways possible. I see no
> > reason
> > > >>> why a
> > > >>>     number of 50 a day shouldn't be achievable within an 18 month
> > > period
> > > >>> if
> > > >>>     this is done right.
> > > >>>     - Setting up an Import strategy - There is an ever growing pool
> > of
> > > >>> open
> > > >>>     data being released. To make full use of it is going to
> require a
> > > >>>     signficant body of up-front work (selecting, categorising,
> > > >>> prioritising,
> > > >>>     tools and import process).
> > > >>>     - Lining up other, structured, mapping tasks - For example
> doing
> > a
> > > 1
> > > >>>     month blitz on lane mapping, or a 3 month clean-up of errors
> > using
> > > >>> Osmi or
> > > >>>     keepright etc etc etc. We did this with the enormous townland
> > > mapping
> > > >>>     project. Smaller scale versions, with a little work, could
> have a
> > > >>> real,
> > > >>>     lasting impact on the map
> > > >>>     - Commiting to organising a State of the Map yearly. This
> doesn't
> > > need
> > > >>>     to have a load of bells and whistles, hell, year one would
> likely
> > > be
> > > >>> one
> > > >>>     day, but it has to be possible to get a 2 day conference going
> > > within
> > > >>> 2
> > > >>>     years, whatever format it may take (barcamp, unconference etc).
> > > >>> There's
> > > >>>     enough going on now between mappers, govt, commercial and
> > academic
> > > >>> folks
> > > >>>     that is easily within reach.
> > > >>>     - Lastly, getting out of Dublin. I know Dublin has the biggest
> > > >>>
> > > >>>     population of mappers, but what about having the meetup in a
> > > location
> > > >>>     outside of Dub once or twice a year. Or there could be a night
> > away
> > > >>> where
> > > >>>     we do a load of ground work on the basemap first, then hit the
> > > ground
> > > >>> in a
> > > >>>     town and get every street name, address, business and
> attraction
> > > all
> > > >>> in one
> > > >>>     day, then meet back somewhere, have a bite to eat and a few
> > drinks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In my head, I'm seeing each of those things needing 2-3 people to
> > work
> > > on
> > > >>> them, i.e. working groups, to ensure nobody gets left holding the
> bag
> > > and
> > > >>> to avoid burnout.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now, I'd like to say, all of the above is purely what *I* think OSM
> > > >>> Ireland
> > > >>> should be about. Others may feel differently, and that's totally
> > fine.
> > > >>> It's
> > > >>> kind of the point of this email :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> With all of that in mind, to get us formally set up, what I am
> > > proposing
> > > >>> is
> > > >>> the following
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 1. A meeting in early Sept  (the 2nd or the 9th) where we will come
> > > >>> together to hammer out a lot of the basics of setting up OSM
> Ireland.
> > > >>> Note,
> > > >>> this will involve people coming together, agreeing on the structure
> > > and,
> > > >>> most importantly, some people agreeing to take some work e.g.
> > research
> > > >>> whats involved in setting up a bank account, what are the legal
> > > >>> requirements, how will we manage membership, etc etc
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2. A second meeting in early Oct where the majority of the
> structure
> > is
> > > >>> locked down. Work to start on Articles of Association etc if
> required
> > > at
> > > >>> this point. Again, some people would need to agree to take on some
> > > tasks
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> keep the process moving.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 3. A third meeting in Nov and a fourth in Dec, to lock down any
> last
> > > >>> elements. At this point we would need to agree a provisional board
> > > >>> probably, to allow for paperwork to proceed for banks, govt. etc.
> > Note,
> > > >>> this board would step down at the first general meeting of OSM
> > Ireland
> > > and
> > > >>> elections would be held at that first meeting.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 4. Jan, get all the paperwork sent to whoever
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 5. TBD, once paperwork is approved by relevant bodies, agenda for
> > first
> > > >>> general meeting to be determined and election process to begin
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There you go. With a bit of luck, before the next round of green
> > > >>> milkshakes
> > > >>> hits McDonalds, we would be a formal entity and we could start
> > talking
> > > >>> about moving to the next stage, which would be completing the OSMF
> > > chapter
> > > >>> application, not to mention any other objectives we might have.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, who's in?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dave
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> Talk-ie mailing list
> > > >>> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Reply via email to