On 9/1/07, Marc Kessels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please keep looking for any more strange issues. I'm still thinking we > > should merge roads with the same name/tags. > > I still oppose, since there are no ways with the same tags. Each road > has its unique AND-ID. Even when this is the only difference between two > roads, You will be loosing information. Especially since not all AND > data types are converted yet. (housenumbers, turn restrictions, ...)
Well, we could combine theose tags specially, like AND_FROM=30943,423,34,342. In any case it doesn't matter, we have the AND_ID of the *nodes* in the database, so even if we didn't have AND_FROM_NODE,AND_TO_NODE we could still put all the street numbers in. That is something else, which of the current AND tags do we want to keep? AND_DEBUG will go away, AND_part is transient. AND-inverted is interesting but in the long run useless. I propose at least those three be removed. It would be ok to still include AND_TO/FROM_NODE, but I fear people will just delete them anyway, so why keep them? Like I said, the nodes have the ID still so we don't need much more than that. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-nl