Am Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:21:41 +0100 schrieb Michał Borsuk <michal.bor...@gmail.com>:
> On 11 January 2011 18:59, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) <te...@teddy.ch> > wrote: > > > I began searching for alternatives and found Oxomoa, unified > > stoparea, stop place and others. All are created because the > > current schema is not able to represent all eventualities. > > It doesn't have to. It is an S-function, reaching 100% costs much > more than reaching 99%. I pretty much came the same way Dominik did. I am also a public transport fanatic. And I like to map small details and it makes me joy to when a bus route crossing a roundabout uses one half of the roundabout in one direction and the other half in the other direction. Till now I had the impression that openstreetmap follows the philosophy "Everybody maps as detailed as he likes". And for enthusiasts it is not only a question of efficency and costs but also of joy, and isn't it because of enthusiasts that openstreetmap exist? If not and if this detailed public transport mapping is not preferred in osm please tell me, then I will find my joy somewhere else. > I am open to change my proposal. I am also open to approve a > completely > > different schema. Michał, please feel free to tell me what to > > change to improve the proposal. To say this proposal has a "bad > > learning curve" may be correct, but it does not help further. > > In another topic. I am looking forward to that! Albin (Almich) _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
