Maybe you have to put roles forward_stop and backward_stop to stops if it's 1 relation for 1 line. It seems most stops have no roles at all Anyway you should also order the relations members by type ways - nodes for stops. Or the problem might be the fact that some stops are railway = halt and some other railway = tram_stop? Anyway check a working example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/365296 - Line SIR1 network APS Mobilità ciao Tiziano
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 18:30, Wojciech Kulesza <wkule...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > i'm trying to follow your discussion on PT proposals. > Was unable to participate due to lack of time. Now sick in bed, I hope to > be able to at least dig through the discussion archives so i can try and add > my two cents worth later on. > > Was wondering if the planned changes to approach in mapping public > transport would have an impact on this service: > http://78.46.81.38/public_transport.html > > While it behaves quite nicely for the examples provided there, it works > very bad for PT in Poland. > > Compare this result: > http://78.46.81.38/api/sketch-line?network=ZTM+Pozna%C5%84&ref=1 > > with the appropariate relation in osm: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/79152 > > Why is this so not working for Poznan ? > > Regards, > Qlex > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
