Matthias Julius wrote: >"Randy" <rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com> writes: > >>Dale Puch wrote: >> >>>For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the >>>stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually >>>there. >>> >>>If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the >>>super >>>walmart as well? Or the bank ect. As for the walmart services >>>themselves, >>>that can be one node, but with the seprate services listed in tags. >>> >>>Dale >> >>Would it be improper to tag the true Wal-Mart services to the building >>way, (either using semicolons or "shop_n" and "amenity_n", and the >>"partnered" services (McDonald's, etc.) as separate nodes in the building, >>and related with "is-in"? > >I consider numbered tags to be messy. Nodes inside the building is not >better unless you are really producing a map of the building's >internals. > >I would use relations for this purpose, e.g. one relation per shop. > >Matthias
I guess I still don't understand all there is to know about relations. I thought you had to have a map entry such as a node or way to relate, in a relation. Back to the wiki for me. -- Randy _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
