Hi all, I've been looking at state parks, state forests and state game lands in Pennsylvania. I think Adam Killian uploaded most of these a year or two ago—I don't know if he's on this mailing list.
Most of these parks are tagged as physical areas. For example, state game lands are natural=wood and leisure=nature_reserve. Unfortunately, these tags don't always correspond to the actual land use. Moreover, they are really administrative entities, not physical ones. So I would like to change them to something similar to the scheme used for parks e.g. in the Bay Area: boundary=national_park admin_level=4 park:type=state_game_land The underlying physical land use can then be mapped orthogonally to this. Are there any objections to this? Am I forgetting anything? Please let me know! Thanks, —Sven _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
