On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Sven Lafebre <s.lafe...@psu.edu> wrote: > Most of these parks are tagged as physical areas. For example, state > game lands are natural=wood and leisure=nature_reserve. Unfortunately, > these tags don't always correspond to the actual land use. Moreover, > they are really administrative entities, not physical ones. So I would > like to change them to something similar to the scheme used for parks > e.g. in the Bay Area: > > boundary=national_park > admin_level=4 > park:type=state_game_land > > The underlying physical land use can then be mapped orthogonally to > this.
I'm not sure if the tagging is correct, but that's probably the right sort of approach moving forward as people might want to micro-map the land cover. Cheers, Adam _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
