Toby Murray wrote: > The good news is that TIGER data is still available to help in > remapping. The TIGER 2011 tiles were recently discussed on > this mailing list: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_2011
Indeed: and Ian, Andy and I have this afternoon briefly discussed making this available on a server so it can be pulled through into OSM by mappers. I've also done some work today on getting Potlatch 2 to load _big_ shapefiles, and tested it on the 55Mb shapefile for LA County. It's not fast, but it works. This too provides a really easy way to get the latest TIGER data into OSM, and once the new version is deployed I'll post some instructions here. Charlotte Wolter wrote: > Do we think that the US map can have any validity if it > doesn't include LA? Depends whether you visit LA I guess ;) , but assuming you do, let's roll up our sleeves and fix it. I don't think that one self-proclaimed viking deciding not to agree to the new licence completely damns OSM! cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Re-Fwd-Re-Post-bot-cleanup-tp5717309p5717318.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
